Vessel Background and Construction

#

The Gullen of Ayr was a wooden brig of approximately 400 tons burthen¹, named for its port of registry in Ayr, a seaport on the west coast of Scotland². Contemporary accounts from its wreck describe the brig’s timbers as solid oak, indicating a sturdy British-built merchant vessel. While the exact shipyard and launch date remain uncertain, evidence suggests the Gullen was built in the 1820s or 1830s and employed in long-distance trade within the British Empire². Its designation “of Ayr” implies Scottish ownership or registry, and Lloyd’s Register entries of the era likely listed the Gullen as a Clyde or Ayrshire-based brig engaged in commerce. By 1841 the vessel had made voyages into the Australasian region, possibly to capitalise on the timber trade. Indeed, on its final voyage the Gullen was laden with timber – most likely valuable red cedar or hardwood from the colonies – hinting that it had come to the Moreton Bay frontier specifically to load a cargo of wood. This trade brought the Gullen far off its usual routes and into the waters of what is now Queensland.

Crew and Notable Passengers

#

Little is known about the people aboard the Gullen of Ayr. No passenger lists or crew rosters have survived in Australian records, and the names of her captain and sailors remain lost to history. Crucially, no survivors from the wreck ever came forward to tell the tale. The absence of colonial reports in the 1840s suggests that the entire crew perished or disappeared without reaching any settlement. Contemporary newspapers and government gazettes of New South Wales (which then encompassed Queensland) make no mention of the Gullen’s loss, implying that no official report was filed at the time. Likewise, there is no record of notable passengers aboard – it appears the brig was a typical working merchantman rather than a transport for well-known figures. The fate of the crew has been reconstructed only from local lore: decades later, Aboriginal elders around Southport recounted that no white men were seen alive at the wreck site after the disaster. All evidence indicates the Gullen’s complement met a tragic end, leaving behind only the silent remains of their ship.

Final Voyage and the Sinking (1841)

#

The Gullen of Ayr’s last voyage culminated off the southern Queensland coast in 1841. Based on later investigation, the brig had loaded a heavy cargo of timber (possibly cedar logs) from a river in the Moreton Bay region – likely the Nerang River or nearby Tweed – and was preparing to depart when disaster struck. In the winter or spring of 1841, a severe south-easterly gale blew up along the coast. South-east gales are notorious for generating high surf and strong onshore winds, and the Gullen was caught in these dangerous conditions. According to early local witnesses, a “heavy south-easterly wind” drove the brig inexorably landward. The ship was blown ashore at the bar of the Nerang River (the entrance to the Broadwater), at a spot known thereafter as Porpoise Point on Stradbroke Island. In a desperate effort to save their ship, the crew cut away the masts – a classic emergency measure to lighten a vessel and prevent capsizing. Despite this, the Gullen grounded bow-first on the sand. The hull stranded with such force that the bow was left pointing inland, firmly embedded in the sandbar.

Helpless against pounding surf, the Gullen soon broke apart. We have no firsthand account of the crew’s last moments, but the ferocity of the storm and the remote, surf-swept location bode ill. Local Aboriginal people later observed the wreck and saw no survivors, indicating the crew likely drowned in the attempt to reach shore or were swept out to sea. Mrs. Graham, a Southport local born in the 1850s, recalled Aboriginal elders saying a ship was “blown ashore” in a gale and that this event had occurred within their own memory (i.e. in the early 1840s). Tellingly, no rescue or salvagewas ever recorded – the Gullen of Ayr simply vanished from the horizon, its fate unknown to the wider world.

Contemporary Records and Reactions

#

At the time of the wreck in 1841, Queensland was sparsely populated and still a frontier region of New South Wales. There were no newspapers or official harbormasters in Moreton Bay documenting such incidents then. Consequently, the loss of the Gullen went largely unremarked in colonial press and government documents. Sydney newspapers in 1841–42 make no mention of the vessel’s disappearance, which is unsurprising given that no survivors or debris reached colonial authorities. It appears the brig was simply listed as missing or never reported at all. Decades later, historians would note that “no records exist in Queensland” showing a ship named Gullen being lost on that coast. This lack of archival record led to considerable mystery about the identity of the Southport wreck for many years. In fact, when the remains were first examined, some speculated it might be a much older wreck. In August 1922, as the buried hull was exposed by shifting sands, locals wondered if it could be Matthew Flinders’ long-lost ship_Porpoise_ (wrecked in 1803) since the location was coincidentally called Porpoise Point. Early reports in 1922 (even picked up by a Reuter’s telegram) noted this theory, given that the wreck appeared “considerably over 100 years old” to some observers. However, this idea was soon dismissed once more evidence came to light.

Rediscovery and Identification of the Wreck

#

The story of the Gullen of Ayr was truly pieced together in the years after its wreck, through occasional sightings and a rediscovery eight decades later. The stranded brig was first seen in 1841 by a cedar-getter, Mr. W. Smith, and an Aboriginal companion nicknamed “Jack in the Box,” while they were crossing the bar of the Nerang River. Smith viewed the wreck from a distance – a broken vessel stranded on the Stradbroke Island beach – but did not approach it. The following year (1842), curiosity seekers made a closer investigation. A shipbuilder named Farrier (sometimes spelled Ferrier) and his assistant Ned Harper trekked from the Tweed River up to the site specifically to inspect the mysterious wreck. They found the hull relatively intact and were able to make out the name on the stern: “Gullen, (of) Ayr.” The men noted the vessel was a brig of about 400 tons, still carrying a load of timber inside. They observed that the masts had been cut away, confirming that whoever crewed the brig had attempted to save her during the gale. Farrier and Harper’s identification provided the key clue to the ship’s identity, but at the time their discovery remained local lore rather than widely published information.

Over the ensuing decades, the wreck of the Gullen gradually disappeared beneath the shifting sands of the barrier island. By the late 19th century, there were no obvious remains visible; the existence of the wreck survived only in the memories of a few old Southport residents and Indigenous locals. Then, in 1922, nature revealed the brig’s skeleton once more. Heavy seas and erosion at the mouth of the Nerang River uncovered part of the old hull, sparking a wave of local excitement. The Brisbane Courier reported in August 1922 that “the wreck on Stradbroke Island which was uncovered by the sea last week has been identified as that of the Gullen, of Ayr, first seen in 1841”. An inspection was organized by the Queensland authorities: Captain C. F. Forester (the Portmaster) and Mr. Thomas Welsby, a noted historian, traveled to the site to examine the remains. They confirmed that the wreck was not centuries old (as the Flinders theory had suggested) but rather a mid-19th-century ship. The size of the keel and frames matched a ~400-ton vessel, and samples of metal fittings recovered were of a type manufactured only since the 1830s. These findings “considerably cleared” the question of the wreck’s age and origin. In fact, Ned Harper’s long-ago reading of the name was remembered: local Aboriginal elders still living in 1922 recalled that this was the very wreck Harper and Farrier had visited in 1842, and that she was certainly the same one known as the Gullen. Thus, the Southport mystery wreck was conclusively linked to the brig Gullen of Ayr lost in 1841.

Archaeological Findings and Modern Investigations

#

When investigators in 1922 revisited the Gullen’s remains, they found only a fragment of the hull still embedded in the sand. About 30 feet of the keel section was intact, broken into three large pieces. The bow and stern had largely disintegrated; at high tide the surf covered what was left of the bow, which pointed shoreward from where it had plowed into the sandbar. Much of the vessel had long since been torn apart by waves or buried. In fact, after Farrier’s 1842 visit, the wreck had been “cut about so much” by souvenir-hunters or timber salvagers that by 1922 it was almost level with the beach sand. Captain Forester noted that removing the sand would facilitate closer study, but also described the practical difficulties of excavation on a surf beach (dry sand endlessly slumps into any pit, and wet sand below the water table is equally unstable). Some small artifacts were recovered – for instance, fastenings and metal sheathing whose composition was analyzed by the Government Analyst to pinpoint the manufacturing date. These tests supported a construction or service date in the early 19th century (roughly 90 years prior, i.e. the 1830s). No significant cargo remained by 1922; presumably the timber cargo either floated off or rotted away over time. By comparing the site and recollections, Welsby and Forester became convinced that this wreck was indeed the Gullen of Ayr, ending any speculation that it was Flinders’ Porpoise or another vessel.

Since the 1922 rediscovery, the Gullen of Ayr wreck has been recognized as part of Queensland’s maritime heritage. The dynamic environment of the Gold Coast has continued to affect the site – the creation of the Jumpinpin Channel in 1898 (when Stradbroke Island split in two) altered tidal flows, and the Nerang River mouth migrated, at times burying and later exposing the wreck further. Today the remains of the Gullen lie in what is now the Gold Coast Broadwater, near the Main Beach/Seaworld area. The approximate location (about 200 meters off Sea World on The Spit) is known to local divers and fisherfolk. The site is protected under the Commonwealth Historic Shipwrecks Act 1976, which automatically shields shipwrecks older than 75 years from disturbance. Although little of the brig is left to see – mostly buried wooden structure and some corroded fittings – the Gullen of Ayr remains an intriguing link to the very early maritime history of Queensland. Modern historians and archaeologists regard it as Queensland’s oldest known shipwreck on record (since it wrecked well before the region’s official ports were established). Its story has been pieced together from archival fragments and the efforts of later investigators. From the construction of a stout oak brig in a Scottish shipyard, to a fateful encounter with a Moreton Bay gale, to its re-emergence in the 20th century as an “ancient wreck,” the Gullen of Ayr offers a compelling case study in historical sleuthing and maritime archaeology on Australia’s shores.

News articles

#

17 August 1922 - The Brisbane Courier - The Southport Wreck

#

The following article was from Trove’s archives¹.

19 August 1922 - The Brisbane Courier - Wrecks on the South Port Coast

#

The following article was from Trove’s archives³.

26 August 1922 - The Queenslander - The Sketcher

#

The following was from Trove’s archives⁴.

30 September 1922 - The Brisbane Courier - The Southport Wreck

#

Sources and References

#

Brisbane Courier (1922). “The Southport Wreck. Identified as the Gullen.” The Brisbane Courier, 17 August 1922, p.8. (Describes the wreck’s discovery in 1841–42 and identification as Gullen of Ayr, a brig of ~400 tons laden with timber).

Brisbane Courier (1922). “Wrecks on the Southport Coast.” The Brisbane Courier, 19 August 1922, p.17. (Historical article recounting the Gullen wreck and other local wrecks; confirms Farrier and Harper’s 1842 observation of the name and Aboriginal memories of the event).

Brisbane Courier (1922). “Southport Wreck – A Stranding of the Last Century.” The Brisbane Courier, 25 August 1922, p.4. (Report of official inspection by the Portmaster and Thomas Welsby; discusses the wreck’s age, construction, and the theory about the name, as well as local oral history of the wreck).

The Queenslander (Brisbane) – Sketcher column (1922). Illustrated feature, 26 August 1922, p.11. (Provided a sketch and narrative of the wreck’s uncovering; captioned as the vessel “first seen in 1841” and supposed to be the Gullin of Ayr).

The Ballarat Star (Victoria) (1922). “An Ancient Wreck – Believed to be Flinders’ Ship.” 22 August 1922, p.1. (Early news telegram speculating the Stradbroke Island wreck was the 1803 HMS Porpoise, reflecting initial confusion prior to the Gullen’s identification).

Commonwealth of Australia (1976 & 2022). Historic Shipwrecks Act and EPBC Act Referral documents – Wonder Reef Permit Application (c.2022). (Lists the Gullen of Ayr wreck site in the Gold Coast Broadwater, ~200m off SeaWorld, as a protected historic shipwreck under Australian law).